DSpace Repository

A comparison between two management systems of protected areas from México (Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve) and from Ecuador (Yasuni National Park)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor JOSÉ ANTONIO ÁVALOS ALONSO;168872 es_MX
dc.contributor LEONARDO ERNESTO MÁRQUEZ MIRELES;200966 es_MX
dc.contributor.advisor Ávalos, José Antonio es_MX
dc.contributor.author Jaramillo Duque, Andrea Estefania
dc.creator ANDREA ESTEFANIA JARAMILLO DUQUE;617709
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-19T18:56:53Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-19T18:56:53Z
dc.date.issued 2016-08
dc.identifier.citation Jaramillo Duque, A. E.. (2016) A comparison between two management systems of protected areas from México (Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve) and from Ecuador (Yasuni National Park) [Tesis de Maestría] Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. Recuperado de: https://repositorioinstitucional.uaslp.mx/xmlui/handle/i/4120
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorioinstitucional.uaslp.mx/xmlui/handle/i/4120
dc.identifier.uri https://www.bibliotecas.uaslp.mx/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=400566
dc.description.abstract Protected areas have been created as a tool to stop habitat loss and provide help in biodiversity conservation. They are essential for the conservation of cultural heritage, promoting cultural values and encouraging sustainable practices of land use. The goods and services that these spaces provide are essential for society and life. They are important for the sustainable development of local communities. Furthermore, they are essential for recreation, tourism, and education; they also contribute to local and regional economies. With this background, two protected areas were analyzed: Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve (RBSAT - for Mexico) and Yasuni National Park (PNY - for Ecuador). Both areas face a number of threats; in PNY´s case, the main concern is related to the oil extraction activities developed within the area. In the case of RBSAT, the main threats include: fires, illegal hunting, changes in land use, extraction of wildlife, among others. Although management tools exist in both areas (programs or plans), they still face high external pressure. For this reason, evaluating each area´s main characteristics and performance was fundamental. In order to accomplish it, a framework analysis was performed, including important information regarding: the countries, the systems of protected areas and the selected areas. A comparison of legal frameworks was necessary to detail the legal documents at different administrative levels (international, national/federal, provincial/state, districts/municipal/ and parishes/local). It was also required to employ the “Kelsen Pyramid”, in order to organize legal documents and establish supremacy. Employing an evaluation of management effectiveness was important to monitor each area´s performance. Finally, a SWOT analysis was developed. Ultimately, it was possible to understand the future steps required to strengthen the organization in both areas. As a result of the comparison between the areas’ realities, backgrounds, management tools, legal documents and performances, several recommendations were detailed at the end of this study. This will facilitate decision-making processes for authorities and reinforce the areas´ management.
dc.description.sponsorship Apoyo de: Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD) y Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) es_MX
dc.language.iso eng es_MX
dc.publisher Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí es_MX
dc.relation.isformatof versión publicada es_MX
dc.relation.ispartof REPOSITORIO NACIONAL CONACYT
dc.relation.ispartof Tesis ubicada en la Mediateca del Centro de Información en Ciencias Biomédicas (CICBI) y en el Centro de Información en Ciencia, Tecnología y Diseño (CICTD)
dc.rights Acceso abierto es_MX
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subject.other 1 CIENCIAS FISICO MATEMATICAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA TIERRA es_MX
dc.title A comparison between two management systems of protected areas from México (Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve) and from Ecuador (Yasuni National Park) es_MX
dc.type Tesis de Maestria es_MX
dc.degree.name Maestría en Ciencias Ambientales
dc.degree.department Agenda Ambiental
dc.audience Investigadores/Researchers
dc.audience Estudiantes/Students
dc.audience Público en general/General public
dc.contributor.committeeMember Márquez Mireles, Leonardo Ernesto
dc.contributor.committeeMember Raedig, Claudia
dc.subject.keyword Ecuador
dc.subject.keyword México
dc.subject.keyword Protected areas
dc.subject.keyword Kelsen Pyramid
dc.subject.keyword SWOT analysis
dc.subject.keyword Management effectiveness
dc.contributor.cataloger eehp/Sist.Inf.
dc.subject.bne Espacios naturales protegidos -- México -- Ecuador -- Tesis académicas
dc.subject.DeCS Áreas protégidas -- México -- Ecuador -- Tesis académicas
dc.subject.DeCS Administración ambiental -- México -- Ecuador -- Tesis académicas


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Acceso abierto Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Acceso abierto

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account